Photo: MANDEL NGAN / AFP / Getty Images
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a Republican-backed case challenging the limits on how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates. The case, initially filed by then-Senate candidate JD Vance and other Republicans, questions the constitutionality of current campaign finance laws. The court is expected to hear arguments in the fall or early 2026.
The case targets a provision of federal election law that has been in place for over 50 years and was previously upheld by the Supreme Court in 2001. However, since Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court in 2005, the conservative majority has overturned several campaign finance regulations, including the landmark 2010 Citizens United decision that allowed unlimited independent spending in federal elections.
Republicans argue that the current caps are inconsistent with the Supreme Court's modern campaign finance doctrine and harm the political system by redirecting funds to super PACs. These PACs can raise unlimited funds but cannot coordinate directly with candidates.
The Justice Department, which usually defends federal laws, has opted not to defend the caps in this case, citing First Amendment concerns. The Trump administration has supported this stance, stating that the restriction violates free speech protections.
Democrats, however, are seeking to intervene to uphold the law, warning that removing the caps could lead to excessive influence by wealthy donors.
The decision could have significant implications for future elections, potentially altering the landscape of campaign finance in the United States.